No Metascore yet

BeamNG PS5 Review Roundup

Last verified: October 24, 2026. CGMagazine — PS5 review, 19 October 2026

CGMagazine scored the PS5 version 5/10 on 19 October 2026. Driven Car Guide published an unscored review on 23 October. Metacritic showed no Metascore on 24 October and said four critic reviews were needed. The PlayStation Store’s 4.83/5 owner rating is a different measure, not a critic aggregate.

Verified facts
CGMagazine5/10, published 19 October 2026
Driven Car GuideUnscored review, published 23 October 2026
MetacriticNo Metascore on 24 October 2026
Concept artwork: a box truck and two damaged police vehicles in a city crash
Concept artwork, not a gameplay screenshot or performance measurement.
Concept artwork: a coupe doing a burnout on a palm-lined street
Concept artwork, not a gameplay screenshot or performance measurement.

This roundup summarises attributed reviews, not an independently played review. CGMagazine’s score is kept separate from Driven’s unscored verdict and the store’s owner rating. A Reddit page that could not be retrieved during this audit is not used as evidence of player consensus.

What did critics say?

Marcus Kenneth’s CGMagazine review gives 5/10, criticising controller ergonomics, menu navigation, and Career’s fit with the crash sandbox while crediting the physics. Damien O’Carroll’s Driven review praises the crash simulation and freedom but flags menus, pop-in, and missing mods. Driven also reports no online multiplayer and limited traffic; those are attributed review observations, not independently measured console specifications.

Playfront’s 6 October first look is a preview, not a scored review. It reports stable 60 fps on PS5 Pro and a 2000 Hz physics tick. Metacritic showed one critic review and no Metascore on 24 October. The available evidence does not justify calculating a new aggregate.

Can Reddit establish a player consensus?

Not from the evidence available here. The linked r/PS5 thread returned HTTP 403 during the 24 October audit. Its comments and claims could not be independently rechecked, so no quotations, performance findings, or consensus claims are drawn from it. Even an accessible single thread would not be a representative player survey.

Who should buy it after those reviews?

Consider it if soft-body crashes and local split-screen are enough at the checked US price of $24.99. Wait if mods, VR, or announced online play are essential. This is editorial buying advice based on the cited feature limitations and two reviews, not an independently played verdict.

Keep reading

Questions

What is the Metacritic score?

There isn’t one yet. The page said a Metascore needs four critic reviews.

What score did CGMagazine give?

5/10, published 19 October 2026.

Did Driven give a number?

No numeric score in the review I read.

What is the store rating?

The US store shows 4.83/5 on 24 October 2026. The number of ratings changes continuously; this is an owner rating, not a critic aggregate.

Do reviewers mention online play?

Driven notes that there is no online multiplayer. That matches the store’s offline listing.

Is the port considered bad?

One scored review says 5/10 and still credits the physics. I am not flattening that into “bad” or “great.”

Sources

Advertisement